Flyt för Aras PLM: - De senaste årens vinnare när det gäller nya användare14/03/2017
Flyt för Aras PLM: - De senaste årens vinnare när det gäller nya användare18/09/2014
”Great ERP, worse PLM” – What SAP PLM needs to sharpen its competitive edge27/08/2014
PLM Spending: A period of “Digestion” after two years of explosive growth14/08/2014
The Market for PLM Services: Why Accenture thinks they can rattle IBM08/07/2014
"A design-lead revolution": Autodesk takes a lead in environmentally friendly product realization - TV-report25/06/2014
TV-report: The Internet of Things – The secret to what PLM and ERP can do in the smart revolution18/06/2014
Not ”a load of crap” anymore: ”PLM 360 is way ahead of plan”, says Autodesk’s Carl Bass20/05/2014
"Demolish the silos in PLM": Why Dassaults Bernard Charles believes in the 3D Experience07/05/2014
The Next Big Boom in PLM and ERP and the Battle Over mBOM Ownership25/04/2014
From the graveyard of ERP to the world’s largest start-up: Infor TV Report15/04/2014
What Happened to Volvo engineering and PLM under Chinese ownership?09/04/2014
Will GE and PTC’s joint venture create a ”PLM and manufacturing advantage”?08/04/2014
Inside Daimler Mercedes Switch from Dassault Systèmes to Siemens PLM and NX19/03/2014
Truck Maker’s PLM Model a Focus in Volkswagen’s War Over Ownership11/03/2014
The Role of 3D Printing in Manufacturing and PLM – TV Report20/02/2014
The Third Platform – A Quantum Leap for PLM and ERP07/02/2014
SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual: Late and Great, but too Expensive? – TV Report23/01/2014
Big Data – Big Problem? – TV Report17/01/2014
Applauds to the European Parliament’s call to modernise EU public works projects with BIM technology14/01/2014
Siemens, Tesis PLMware and Industry 4.006/01/2014
Why PTC acquired ThingWorx and how M2M will change everything12/12/2013
Autodesk’s CEO, Carl Bass: We want to change the way people work – TV Report10/12/2013
How MOBILITY transforms Product Development, Manufacturing and Service – TV Report26/11/2013
Can PLM Systems Manage Highly Complex Products? – TV Report19/11/2013
Dassault’s 3DEXPERIENCE Platform – TV Report01/10/2013
PLM Systems Cleared for Take Off at Airbus15/09/2013
FRONTRUNNERS Takes a Look Inside Volvo’s Construction Equipment29/01/2013
Battle of the Visions part 3: PTC breaks new ground in the PLM landscape - claims CEO Jim Heppelmann25/11/2011
User experience the deciding factor when Dutch shipbuilder, Damen, chose IFS27/04/2011
PTC’s Windchill 10.0 – will 100 million in R&D take PLM to the next level?14/03/2011
The French Connection ...more possibilities than problems, when SolidWorks is “dassaultified”?17/01/2011
Management swap at SolidWorks - Jeff Ray Steps down as CEO, Bertrand Sicot takes over13/12/2010
SolidWorks’ Jeff Ray confirms in an interview transition to Dassault’s V6 platform10/11/2010
Large automotive OEMs dont switch CAD software. Its just too expensive to change. Thats why it was such a big deal when Daimler AG - Mercedes chose to make this dramatic move in late 2010. The company announced that it would replace Dassault Systèmes CATIA with its toughest competitor, Siemens PLMs NX.
This was a heavy blow for Dassault Systèmes, but nothing could prevent phase-out. Obviously Daimler had reached a level where the benefits of implementing a new system outweighed the complexity of improving an existing one. And so the migration process was initiated in the summer of 2011. The goal is to be finished with the bulk of the migration in 2015 for cars and vans and in 2016 for trucks and buses, said Daimler Mercedes PLM project manager, Dr. Peyman Merat.
So whats the current status of this huge project? New information has emerged from sources at Mercedes stating that the migration is going according to plan, and that the project "PLM 2015" has entered a critical phase. The plan is to be done on the automotive side by April next year. In total, more than 6,000 employees are affected by the change, and to date over 2,000 have undergone the necessary training. The remaining 4,000 are to complete the training program in 2014.
Lets take a closer look at the reasons for the Daimler CAD switch.
Bernard Charles - an air of confidence
Many things can be said about Bernard Charles, the CEO and
President of French Dassault Systèmes; he has an air of confidence and
perhaps more, at least according to some of his competitors. But its
also true that few in the industry have done so much to proselytize for
PLM as this charismatic visionary. The same thing goes for his latest
passion; the Companys 3D Experience concept. According to Bernard,
this is the next evolutionary step in IT for product realization. "It
is", he says, "the step beyond PLM – a next generation system".
CAD the main revenue driver at Dassault
Given the "beyond PLM vision", it is perhaps a little surprising that
Dassault today is primarily a CAD company, at least in terms of
revenues. According to figures from PLM analyst CIMdata, direct sales
of CAD software represented approximately $ 1.6 billion (60%) of the
companys total revenue of $ 2.6 billion in 2012. This was made up of
CATIA (about 1.1 billlion) and SolidWorks (about 0.5).
This reliance on CAD may point to one of DS major challenges: to
get their solutions to operate smoothly in heterogeneous IT
environments, which almost always is the situation at larger
DS has long excelled in pure Dassault environments. The companys
solutions have excellent, even seamless connections throughout the
product development chain. 3D Experience is a particularly good example
of this, as are DSs recently created 14 industry-specific solutions.
But after much criticism and several steps back from a monolithic
approach – third party integration still can be a problem. That was
one of the major drivers for the Daimler decision.
Plus 6,000 licenses at stake
In the case of Daimler, the cost for Dassault turned out to be an
installed base of over 6,000 CAD licenses of CATIA. However, the worst
damage was not the loss of a prestige customer or big licensing
revenue; the biggest loss for Dassault was worse than that. The German
automotive industry is one of the worlds most important market
clusters for PLM software. Were not talking only about the large OEMs:
the supply chain related to the automotive giants are of equal, if not
greater importance. They consume even more PLM software than the
OEMs. And if Daimler wants NX instead of CATIA, well, supply chain
manufacturers may be driven to change as well.
A change driven by compatibility
So why did Daimler switch systems? Naturally, there were several
reasons, but one of the most important ones was the coupling
requirements between CATIA V6 and ENOVIA. Add to that the fact that
Daimlers proprietary product database, SMARAGD (based on Siemens PLMs
cPDM solution, Teamcenter), was incompatible with CATIA V6.
Thus, the decision to switch was made. When I spoke to him during
PLM Europe in Linz, Dr. Peyman Merat was reluctant to go into detail
about the reasoning, but he confirmed that "our change is driven by
compatibility issues between CAD and PDM software".
He also said that the migration of product data began in July 2011,
and that 2012 was about developing methodology and getting real about
using NX in projects.
Can Daimler work with NX and Catia data together?
Dr. Merat said that yes, to enable this Daimler created a
multi-CAD data model in their product database SMARAGD (12.1) with an
interface that solves the format problems.
Dr. Merat also said that they created an "NX package for subcontractors"
and that the distribution of these started as early as 2011.
Organizationally, the roll-out of NX is being conducted through a
sophisticated project plan. The German car manufacturer has appointed
special "rollout managers" who ensure that the migration process is
executed. The training programs are role-based and tailored to the
different departments needs.
Theres no doubt that Daimlers NX commitment is long-term. They have
signed a ten year agreement with Siemens PLM. Dassault Systemes also
acquired orders for new software (CATIA, ENOVIA and the digital
manufacturing solution Delmia) from Daimler during the transitional
period, but a qualified guess is that this stream will slowly dry up.
The fact that Siemens PLM has both NX and their PLM Teamcenter suite
in place at Daimler makes their already strong position in the German
automotive industry even stronger. With PLM (Teamcenter) customers like
Daimler and the giant VAG Group (Volkswagen AG) they are as dominant
on the cPDM side as DS CATIA is on CAD.
Both Volkswagen and BMW are up for renewed CATIA contracts in the
coming couple of years, and Siemens PLMs chief executive, Chuck
Grindstaff, seems confident:
He said that the increasing complexity of vehicle design and development
has forced many automotive companies to evaluate their existing
systems to ensure that they use the premier technology solution.
Daimler is no exception...